Decentralised Applications (DApps)

Decentralised Applications or DApps operate on blockchain networks without central control, providing secure, transparent platforms for conservation initiatives. They can facilitate peer-to-peer carbon credit trading, biodiversity data management, and direct donor-to-project transactions, helping measure and verify conservation impact. By eliminating intermediaries, DApps ensure funds and resources reach intended recipients efficiently and transparently. These applications also enhance decentralised conservation reporting, allowing local communities, scientists, and funders to collectively validate data on biodiversity changes and conservation outcomes. Additionally, DApps improve resource allocation and financial management by enabling conservation organisations to track grants, disbursements, and expenditures in real time, increasing accountability and reducing waste. However, their success depends on accessibility, blockchain literacy, and a user-friendly design. When tailored to conservation needs, DApps enhance trust, accountability, and effective funding distribution.

Discover how your organisation could explore decentralised applications to improve collaboration, data sharing, and positive conservation impact through the Navigating Web 3.0 Guide for conservationists.

Case Study: Open Forest Protocol (OFP) is a decentralised platform designed to increase the transparency, efficiency, and accessibility of reforestation efforts worldwide. Built on the NEAR blockchain, OFP enables local communities and project developers to collect standardised forest data using mobile applications, which is then independently verified through a broad and expanding peer review network of forest-technology companies and practitioners and permanently recorded on-chain. This model enhances trust in reforestation outcomes and promotes greater inclusion in carbon finance, supporting long-term stewardship and livelihood opportunities. While OFP’s current focus is on reforestation under its Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation (ARR) methodology, the platform’s open architecture offers a blueprint for how decentralised applications can contribute to broader biodiversity goals. By lowering technical and financial barriers, embedding transparency into environmental monitoring, and centring community governance, OFP demonstrates how emerging technologies can support enabling conditions for species recovery and ecosystem restoration.

Written by Dr. Louisa Richmond-Coggan, LRC Wildlife Conservation Consulting

Targets & Actions

This technology can support the implementation of targets 4, 8, 14, 16, 19, and 21

target icon

Target 19 - Mobilize $200 Billion per Year for Biodiversity From all Sources, Including $30 Billion Through International Finance

Substantially and progressively increase the level of financial resources from all sources, in an effective, timely and easily accessible manner, including domestic, international, public and private resources, in accordance with Article 20 of the Convention, to implement national biodiversity strategies and action plans, by 2030 mobilizing at least 200 billion United States dollars per year, including by: (a) Increasing total biodiversity related international financial resources from developed countries, including official development assistance, and from countries that voluntarily assume obligations of developed country Parties, to developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, to at least US$ 20 billion per year by 2025, and to at least US$ 30 billion per year by 2030; (b) Significantly increasing domestic resource mobilization, facilitated by the preparation and implementation of national biodiversity finance plans or similar instruments according to national needs, priorities and circumstances; (c) Leveraging private finance, promoting blended finance, implementing strategies for raising new and additional resources, and encouraging the private sector to invest in biodiversity, including through impact funds and other instruments; (d) Stimulating innovative schemes such as payment for ecosystem services, green bonds, biodiversity offsets and credits, benefit-sharing mechanisms, with environmental and social safeguards; (e) Optimizing co-benefits and synergies of finance targeting the biodiversity and climate crises; (f) Enhancing the role of collective actions, including by indigenous peoples and local communities, Mother Earth centric actions2 and non-market- based approaches including community based natural resource management and civil society cooperation and solidarity aimed at the conservation of biodiversity; (g) Enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency and transparency of resource provision and use.